Our analysis of the dyad’s routines of care found that despite the use of private and public services related to the provision of in-home health and social support, solidarity between older people and their family caregivers is not weakened. On the contrary, it remains strong due to the contingent characteristics of the formal home care system. The role of the family is essential to provide and negotiate key aspects of client’s care that are not addressed by the formal care system. In this context, private bureaucracy complements both client’s self-care and family care, serving to compensate for the inconsistencies of the services received.
Although our analysis is based on data from Canada, our reflections include a comparative stance that takes into account how the presence of bureaucracy (both public and private) differentially affects the solidarity between older people and their families. While Canada has a strong presence of bureaucratic institutions, in which the welfare state plays an important role, in other countries like Chile, characterized by its neoliberal policies, the role of the bureaucracy is still marginal and family solidarity almost the only alternative.