When addressed to individuals, the communication strategy is all oriented to what is called the “eco-gestures”; these refers to practices supposed easy to be adopted, and which would allow citizens to reduce their personal greenhouse gases production.
I have studied a group of citizens, living in a French countryside near Germany, who have participated to an experiment of voluntary limitation of their greenhouse gases emissions. During two years, though a regular measure of their emissions in their habitation, transports, alimentation and consumption, they were receiving some advises from an ecological association to try to reduce these greenhouse gases emissions.
I focused particularly my attention on the conflicts, tensions or gaps that appears between their pattern of an “ecological concerned citizen”, and their practices. I observe the way they tend to solve these personal conflicts, through defensive discourses, but also through marginal or more substantial changes. I make two principal assessments. First, the environmental motivations rarely are sufficient to drive to a significant change, but they may help in the decision and the kind of choices made. Second, the minor changes can also lead to a spiral of changes or a “gearing effect”. Despite the logical of “eco-gestures” play a role in mobilisation of the citizens, and should not be neglected, it also has its limits, and cannot substitute for action of local authorities at a more structural level.