The Elicited Knowledge By ‘Anthropocene Cradle of Juridical Wisdom’ Face-to-Face with Contemporary Types of Societal Analysts; Why ALL These; Is a Subtle Clue? - Does It Matter?
*B Some chapters of the aggregated and elicited knowledge (related)...
*B1 The elicited knowledge by ‘ANTHROPOCENE CRADLE OF JURIDICAL WISDOM’ FACE-TO-FACE WITH CONTEMPORARY TYPES OF SOCIETAL ANALYSTS
*B2 Dedication IN MEMORIAM - to_four_personalities: The 1st: Saint Apostle ANDREW – the 2nd: [Honorary] Academician [Ethnolog] Romulus VULCANESCU – the 3rd: Socio-Cybernetician Felix GEYER – the 4th: Academician [Structural-Phenomenologist] Mihai DRÃGÃNESCU
*B3 Proposer: Prof. Ph.D. Nicolae Bulz - ISA member / RC 35, RC55 and TG04 member
*B4 There are five personalities to whom I should ask the direct participation [from four countries]
*B4.1: On and about a ‘PLEISTOCEN CRADLE OF JURIDICAL WISDOM’ and the modern recourse:
-1.1 On (a quasi-unknown) Neolithic to Ancient human - to be community killed as next messengers to Gods / versus the modern/contemporary ‘war-peace-war’ stance...
-1.2 About the (embedded / ‘inborn’) juridical wisdom within the pre-historic and paleo-historic communities [Romulus VULCANESCU]
-1.3 About the knowledge of Saint Apostol Andrew’s ‘in ovo’ analytic approach to the world and the life.
*B4.2: About a finite set of “societal analysts-types”:
-2.1 Felix GEYER’s knowledge elicited/exposed set of three analysts: ROMANTICS, CYNICS, REALISTS.
-2.2 Case-studies ‘Known’ by the proposer: four types of high-level analysts.
*B4.3: On and about a Limits, Paradoxes, Heritage, Challenge, Perspectives on the Humans’ outlook on life and religion, justice and progress.
-3.1 Göblek Tepe (10,000 years ago) turning the human (retro-)reflection on the ‘Culture-Religion-Work’ succession
- 3.2 Tartaria Tablets – ‘Danubien Civilisation’ versus Mésopotamie_Egypt_...........