Methodological Challenges of Conducting Sociological Research in Ukraine during the War

Tuesday, 8 July 2025: 00:00
Location: ASJE028 (Annex of the Faculty of Legal, Economic, and Social Sciences)
Oral Presentation
Kovalska YELIENA, University of Konstanz, Germany
Mykola SYDOROV, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine
Svitlana SALNIKOVA, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine
Conducting sociological research in conflict zones poses unique methodological challenges, especially in a country like Ukraine, where ongoing war and large-scale displacement significantly disrupt data collection efforts. This study explores the specific difficulties faced by researchers in Ukraine during the Russian-Ukrainian war, highlighting issues related to data reliability, sampling, and the representativeness of surveys.

One of the major challenges is the absence of up-to-date demographic data, as the last full census was conducted in 2001. The war has exacerbated this issue, with high levels of forced internal and external migration complicating the identification and description of the target population. Researchers have had to rely on outdated data and alternative approaches, such as online surveys and recruitment through social media, to reach respondents. This shift to digital data collection, while necessary, introduces new biases and errors, such as non-random sampling and potential accessibility issues for respondents affected by the war.

The study also addresses the ethical implications of conducting research in conflict zones, including maintaining confidentiality and data protection under extreme conditions. Online methods, though offering broader reach and real-time data collection, also raise concerns about respondent safety and data accuracy.

Despite these challenges, the research underscores the resilience and adaptability of Ukrainian sociologists in navigating these complex conditions. By employing innovative methodologies and continuously refining their approaches, researchers are able to capture valuable insights into the social dynamics of a country at war. This work contributes to the broader understanding of conducting empirical social research in crisis contexts and highlights the critical need for methodological flexibility and ethical vigilance.