Affects and Solidarity Work in the Aftermath of the Beirut Port Explosion
This study adopts an iterative interpretive and affective analytical approach to analyze interviews, fieldnotes, and secondary data, uncovering how emotions like anger, guilt, and shared suffering acted as affective triggers, mobilizing individuals into solidarity initiatives. Through the analysis, I propose a process model that outlines three trajectories: (1) affective triggers, (2) solidarity engagement, and (3) healing pathways. This model illustrates how negative affects were processed and transformed through collective action, fostering a sense of shared purpose and emotional recovery. Ultimately, the study reveals how solidarity contributed to the redirection of affective energies, gradually leading to a new social arrangement centered on solidarity and a return to affective stability.
By highlighting the long-term affective dimensions of post-disaster organizing, this research offers new insights into the transformative potential of affective solidarity, shedding light on its role in both individual and collective healing.