On the Possibility and Reality of Advancing AI in Legal Theory and Practices: Some Theoretical and Methodological Considerations Supported By Ongoing Empirical Research

Thursday, 10 July 2025: 14:00
Location: SJES025 (Faculty of Legal, Economic, and Social Sciences (JES))
Oral Presentation
Andrey REZAEV, Rikkyo Institute for Global Urban Studies, USA, Rikkyo Institute for Global Urban Studies, Japan
Saidakhror GULYAMOV SAIDAKHROR, Tashkent State Universisty of Law, Uzbekistan
Said GULYAMOV, Tashkent State Universisty of Law, Uzbekistan
Munavvarkhon MUKHITDINOVA, Institute for Advanced Studies and Statistical Research, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
The paper aims to define the challenges that juridical theory and practice face with the advancement of AI systems and instruments in everyday life. It correlates these challenges with the human-centered approach (Human-Centered AI), emphasizing the importance of human involvement in exploring artificial intelligence and making legal decisions.

The original data and empirical materials for this paper are derived from ongoing longitudinal research, a collaborative effort between the Chair of 'Digital Economy' at the Institute for Advanced Studies and Statistical Research of the Statistics Agency under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the State Law University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. This research is crucial in providing current insights into the impact of AI on legal theory and practice in the region.

Structurally, the paper is organized as follows. First, it pays attention to several vital aspects associated with the ideas of digital transformations and AI technologies in the theory and methodology of jurisprudence. Then, it considers the problems and prospects of the rapid penetration of AI into society's everyday life and its legal practices, which changes the characteristics of juridical work and the structure of legal systems. The paper stresses two basic factors determining the advancement of AI instruments into legal practice: artificial sociality and online culture. The next key point of the paper argues that AI instruments are already a powerful means of solving some of the most burning problems facing society. Still, they are not a panacea, specifically when it comes to legal practices.

In conclusion, the authors formulate three principles of human-centered AI for the legal sphere.