Beyond the ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Cop Talk: Understanding Autocratization and Climate Governance in the Post-Paris Agreement Era
We investigate how anticipatory knowledge claims and futures imaginaries shape, and are shaped by, the actions of various stakeholders, including those in fossil fuel-dependent autocracies. This study seeks to illuminate the performativity of these knowledge practices, considering their potential to foster transformation and justice amidst the recognition of loss and injustice caused by ecological catastrophes. Ultimately, we aim to foster dialogue that encourages innovative approaches to climate action, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity and justice in shaping sustainable futures. We posit that discussions on the nexus between authoritarianism and environmentalism have historically focused on regime type rather than actions and conditions. Instead, we seek to inquire into the implications of assertive authoritarian regimes seeking global legitimacy by engaging in climate governance.
Furthermore, we address the responsibility of social scientists in these debates, urging a critical reflection on their roles in advocating for emancipatory futures that blend recognition of current injustices with aspirations for equitable climate governance. This research contributes to an emerging discourse on authoritarian environmentalism, offering fresh insights into how diverse governance approaches inform global climate negotiations and the responsibilities of the global research community. Ultimately, we aim to foster dialogue that encourages innovative approaches to climate action, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity and justice in shaping sustainable futures.