The Ideologized Field of Cultural Production?
Art Versus Commerce Versus Politics, or: The Artistic World Reversed
Our paper takes the case of the cultural field of fashion to demonstrate how the climate crisis enforces political engagement and makes ideology salient into relatively autonomous cultural fields. Our analysis of fashion legislation, magazines, journalists, and digital intermediaries shows how political actors, from activists to lawmakers, enter the field to form coalitions and spread ideologies that challenge or defend the status quo of a cultural field predicated on ecologically destructive practices. This ‘ideologization’ ultimately leads to the introduction of a second heteronomous pole, next to the heteronomous pole of the market, changing the logic of the field from a bipolar opposition of (high status) aesthetics versus (low status) commerce, to a threefold logic opposing aesthetics vs politics vs commerce. This threefold logic reshapes the doxa of the field, leading to new op/positions in the field, and causing the players in the field to develop new strategies to (not) deal with the climate crisis. We thus offer a redevelopment of field theory for the unique of the climate crisis to not only cultural fields, but more broadly to the contemporary fielded societies.