The Just Transition Deferred: The Case of South Africa’s Dysfunctional Shared Ownership Model in Renewable Energy
This is frequently due to failures to advance procedural justice, including rushed processes for establishing trusts, and domination by company representatives that have little experience in community development or participatory processes. Eventual trustees similarly lack experience in financial or project management or are regarded as illegitimate representatives of their communities. Moreover, government provides neither resources nor guidelines for establishment or operations, resulting in fragile and ineffective institutional structures. Finally, the redistributive potential of the trusts is undermined by paralysing terms on the debt used to finance the trusts ownership’ stakes, and repayment has often fully consumed the trusts’ income. Inadequate, indifferent implementation of progressive policy has thus perpetuated old inequalities and led to widespread disillusionment, leading to calls from diverse quarters to abandon the policy. South Africa’s experience is a useful case study to inform global debates about the ownership and financing of green infrastructure, and about the complexities of promoting social justice in the global energy transition.