Cross-Legitimation Processes between Traditional and Alternative Medicines
Based on extensive fieldwork that we have been conducting for ten years, we observe an assemblage of different medicines that share a subordinated position in relation to biomedicine. On one hand, TM holds recognition by international organizations and state health legislation, which paves the way for a number of CAM practices—especially those associated with neo-shamanisms—to also be included. On the other hand, the social recognition of CAM among high and upper-middle classes makes other healing perspectives more visible, allowing TM to move beyond community confines and reach a broader audience.
In this process, therapeutic practices tend to detach from the medical systems that give them their meaning and, sometimes, efficacy. Since this also involves taking into account their respective worldviews, that includes spiritualities, the ways in which different therapeutic approaches coexist become a fundamental dimension in understanding medical pluralism. It is therefore significant to recognize the risks of a folklorized multiculturalism, as well as to avoid essentialisms that deny the inherent dynamism of any medical system. Ultimately, conceptualizing pluralism from a sociocultural perspective implies understanding that individuals belong to cultural groups and are embedded in symbolic, social and political universes.