Who’s Fooling Who? When Partisan Loyalty Doesn’t Trump Democratic Commitments
But are citizens in highly democratic countries truly immune to partisan bias? Some argue that motivated reasoning—where individuals process biased information to bolster their party attachment and social identity—is inevitable. Others contend that it also involves a balance between reinforcing party loyalty and making accurate evaluations, influenced by external conditions. In this view, more liberal democracies create informational environments where anti-democratic attitudes are harder to justify, thus constraining motivated reasoning, reducing the risk of partisan-driven anti-democratic views, and elevating democratic commitments over partisan loyalty.
Running on data from the Understandings and Evaluations of Democracy modules in the European Social Survey (ESS), multilevel models provide evidence that the belief that governments should stick to their policies when they contradict public opinion is a minority view across 18 European countries. This view is even rarer in countries with stronger liberal democratic traditions. In addition, while supporters of incumbent parties are more likely to favor sticking to policies, this inclination weakens significantly in more liberal settings, even among those who strongly identify with incumbent parties. These findings lend empirical support for the notion that in liberal democracies, party supporters are less willing to trade off democratic values for partisan loyalty.