Breaking the Glass Door in Academia? the Role of Contextual Factors in Moderating the Gender Gap in Recruitment. Evidence from Italy.

Women’s presence in academia has sharply increased in recent years but gender inequalities in career progression persist. Italy makes no exception to this trend as different studies on the promotion gap to associate and to full professors have suggested. However, no measure of the adjusted gender differential in the previous steps of the career, that is in the transition from the post-doc to the assistant professor position, has been provided so far. This paper aims to fulfill this gap by means of an original, longitudinal and multi-source, dataset on the Italian academic population which has allowed to measure the female disadvantage in recruitment by controlling for a large set of confounding characteristics including individual productivity and, most especially, contextual factors, which have been under-explored so far. Results suggest that women face a small adjusted penalty, of around 3-4%, in academic recruitment. However, when disentangling the analyses by scientific field, strong differences emerge, with the gap reaching a maximum of -14% in physics while being non significant in many SSH. Within the STEMM, the life sciences, driven by medicine and biology, appear more gender unequal than many hard sciences. Moreover, a growing number of female full professors in the field and working in a department with good financial resources are factors likely to reduce the gap. All in all, this work sheds light on the importance of organizational and institutional determinants in explaining the gender gap thus calling for structural interventions to make universities more inclusive towards women.