System-Institutional Approach and the Reflexive Model of Socio-Cultural Institution
We are based upon the presumption of transdisciplinarity: the basic concepts of the system-institutional approach are interpreted as general and “cross-cutting” for social disciplines. So the systemic principle of holism should be applied primarily to the system-forming concept of “institution”: there are no legal, economic, political, cultural, etc. institutions – but there are “integral” institutions that have legal, economic, political, and cultural, etc. aspects.
The Reflexive Model of Socio-Cultural Institution includes:
1) formal places and procedures + regulatory principles (a scheme defining the system of regulative rules);
2) symbolic fastening (with the function of “protective layer”);
3) material supporting mechanisms;
4) a value idea (an ideal “core” that sets the meaning and value purpose of the institution which manifests certain collective intentionality);
5) spiritual supports (cognitive/moral mechanisms for awareness of norms and socio-cultural rooting of the institute).
Thus, the socio-cultural institution is a socio-cultural unit with reflexive mechanisms acting through spiritual supports and symbolic fastening. The ultimate framework of institutional self-awareness that sets its integrity is the value idea. Acting through collective intentionality addressed to the value idea, this reflexive mechanism supports an equilibrium-based account of a socio-cultural institution. Another system-forming factor for the reproduction of the institution as a whole is the form/mechanism of its social organization: law, custom, ritual, routine practice, procedure/order, etc. These mechanisms support the sustainability of regulative rules.