Childhood, Geontopower and the Anthropocene
RC04 Sociology of Education
Language: English
Although important, childhood studies has much work to do in challenging what Yusoff (2018, 2024) describes as the white Anthropocene, which disregards “the historical colonial geographies that materially delivered humanism, its structures of thought (the human and its “others” and in parallel the discourse of nature and its ‘others’), its organization of value (philosophy of natural philosophy, ethics, and racial capitalism), and its scientific and industrial institutions (that were funded, and thereby grounded, in the financial spoils of imperial enterprise)” (2020, p. 663-4). This session invites papers that engage childhood studies within these problematics. Topics might include, but are not limited to: geontopower; live vs nonlife – including the inhuman; colonial Anthropocene; underground agencies.
Yusoff, K. (2018). A billion black Anthropocenes or none. University of Minnesota Press.
Yusoff, K. (2020). The Inhumanities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(3), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1814688
Yusoff, K. (2024). Geologic life: inhuman intimacies and the geophysics of race. Duke Press.
See more of: RC04 Sociology of Education
See more of: Research Committees