182.1
Transnational Faith-Based Engagement on Climate Change Governance
Climate change was one of 4 major themes at the Parliament, and two major faith-networks, plus numerous other faith groups , are operative in the civil society sector at the COP22 international negotiations. This researcher’s active participation in these faith networks at each event, is compared also with observation of the Climate Action Network (CAN) at COP22. Frames, motivations, resources, meeting practices, efforts to engage in media relations, coalitions with other civil society sectors, and efforts to mobilize broader constituencies are all items of consideration. The faith-networks and CAN operated differently in most of these efforts. Religious groups do not attend to climate-related and sustainable development inequalities in the same ways. Similarly, faith-based actors do not uniformly identify and enact the role of “spirituality” in their engagements. Other civil society and government agents query what religions bring to the climate meetings, other than the potential mobilization of religious publics. In response, faith-based actors and organizations position themselves in a cosmopolitics that extends beyond the human sphere. This points to the different topographies of the social fields of environmental civil society and religiously-environmental civil society and their interactions on the political field. Faith groups such as Tzu Chi (Buddhist), ACT Alliance (Christian), and Islamic Relief operate across borders, making them important elements of transnational civil society.