748.2
‘It’s Our Moral Imperative As (White) Americans’: The Classed Meanings of Whiteness and the Politics of Immigration in Arizona
Specifically, I find that pro-immigrant activism attracted white participants who struggled with being politically progressive, on the one hand, and socioeconomically privileged on the other. Aware of the gulf separating their own experiences from the plight of disadvantaged groups, pro-immigrant biographies revealed failed attempts to be ‘good white allies.’ At the border, however, they realized that they could exploit their privilege. There, race and class privilege became a (possible) tool to weaken the state and help a vulnerable group. This rare opportunity is what made border activism appealing to pro-immigrant respondents.
Restrictionist activism, meanwhile, appealed to blue-collar men who grappled with being simultaneously privileged and marginalized. Restrictionists felt that they were more American and concomitantly, more entitled to a good life than ethnic minorities and immigrants. Yet, restrictionists’ lives were characterized by the marginalization of downward mobility. Shoring up the state allowed restrictionists to manage this crisis of racial privilege and class marginalization. As civilian extension of Border Patrol, restrictionists felt powerful, active, and needed. Volunteer work in the borderlands helped them escape the disempowerment they otherwise felt.