928.2
Sensing, Seeing, and Striking: A Case Study of Two U.S. Airstrikes on Protected Sites
Through an analysis of two U.S. air strikes targeting protected civilian structures, a hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan and a mosque in al-Jinah, Syria, we examine two questions: 1) How do protected structures become visualized and interpreted as military targets? 2) And, how do state actors and NGOs strategically deploy images to support or challenge official narratives regarding these attacks? We find that visual artefacts play a central role in displacing and assigning accountability within debates over the operations’ legality, successes, and failures. U.S. military actors mobilize images “from above” to simultaneously justify force and construct its attacks on the buildings as “precise” and “proportional,” while conceding to gross organizational and technical errors. Drawing on local knowledges and visualities, NGOs instead produce and circulate visual material to challenge state narratives and its mis-recognition of the buildings’ lived uses. Our analysis points to the ways in which a range of novel image types--from drone images to multimedia composites and architectural reconstructions--become enrolled in these contestations and help to unsettle meanings of “precision” itself.