The Rise and Fall of Authoritarian Populisms (Hopefully)

The Rise and Fall of Authoritarian Populisms (Hopefully)

Proposal of Joint Session of RC 36 and 48

Organizer: Lauren Langman

The rise of the bourgeois class led to the demise of dynastic rule, and ascent of popularly elected, “parliamentary” governments, but by the middle of the 19^th C, two distinct moments were evident, a progressive cadres of the industrial working classes, and a conservative bourgeois capitalist class. But by the early 20^th C. between alienation and adversity, there was growing dissent toward existing parliamentary elites and the rise of authoritarian populisms, indeed fascism, foretold by Marx as “Bonapartism,” was clearly evident with rise of Mussolini and Hitler and theorized by Schmidt as the reaction to the weakness of democracy. Only a “powerful” leader, indifferent to democracy, rules of law or human rights can and will lead the victimized people.

These “leaders” have been undermined by a tiny virus. What must be noted is the growing opposition of progressive forces, especially young activists. the young followers of Sanders whose organization has a role in defeating Trump, the revitalized workers party in Brazil, and the massive farmer’s protests Modi and the BJP. For Mannheim the historical context of every generation shapes a world view that endured in later life. While the right populisms may seem powerful, their angry politics of grievance and victimhood inspires progressive counter movements that will be their demise. Growing numbers of progressive youth are challenging the reactionary, trends-and history tells us, that is the future.