Social Inequalities, Affirmative Action Policy and Social Justice In India
Abstract Submissions Closed
TG03 Human Rights and Global Justice (host committee)
RC19 Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy
Language: English
Session Type: Oral
This paper critically analyzes how state-led policies of reservation have sought to reconcile the principles of social justice with constitutional limits, particularly through debates surrounding proportional representation, the ‘creamy layer’ criterion, and the 50 percent ceiling on reservations.
The paper argues that while affirmative action has played a crucial role in expanding access to education and public employment for historically marginalised groups, it has also generated persistent political contestation and legal scrutiny, revealing tensions between caste, class, and economic criteria of disadvantage. The introduction of the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) reservation through the 103rd Constitutional Amendment is examined as a significant shift in the discourse on social justice, signalling a move from caste-based to economic definitions of inequality. By situating India’s reservation policies within broader sociological debates on inequality, state power, and redistribution, this paper contributes to comparative discussions on affirmative action and social justice in the Global South.
Key words: Social Inequalities; Social Justice; Affirmative Action Policy; Other Backward Classes; Caste and Class; Supreme Court.
See more of: RC19 Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy
Back to: Full Group Listing
