This article intends to discuss the limits and possibilities of utilizing science as a base for political decision making. In order to do that it will analyze the means by which social actors involved with the elaboration of three public measures for biodiversity conservation in the state of Rio de Janeiro (RJ, Brazil) make use of scientific knowledge.
Policy makers involved in the process which established two areas of environmental conservation, and in the formulation of the so-called Atlantic Forest Law to regulate the anthropic activity in the remaining areas of this biome, were interviewed.
At least four configurations of interrelation between the scientific and the political realm were identified: (1) when a politician seeks scientific grounding; (2) when the resort to science is intermediated by technical knowledge which translates scientific knowledge; (3) when scientific knowledge is dismissed for not corresponding to hegemonic political interests; (4) when science is perceived as an additional political field, with a dispute for greater legitimization between different paradigms.
We hope to contribute towards developing a critical argumentation on the linear approach in the formulation of public policies based on scientific evidence and on the model of co-production of knowledge. Thus, we hope to promote and to contribute towards a reflection on the limits and possibilities of bridging the communication gap between science and politics against the backdrop of sustainable development