In its early years (2004), the SP cared only for 1.5 million families which where affiliated; in 2010, this turned to 42.5 individuals. The money injected by the SP in the country’s health units has permitted better attention for people in need of healthcare, especially for people located in marginalized regions.
In this context, the private initiative of microinsurance concerning health care seems irrelevant as well as non-viable. Nonetheless, in spite of the SP, Microfinance Institutions that develop these initiatives continues to observe, in their targeted affiliated population, a true impoverishment due to catastrophic costs in health. They argue that an effective solution to compensate for the timid results from the public sector is to implement, in partnership with traditionnal insurance companies, microinsurance products which impacts in the reduction in the vulnerability to health risks in rural homes. They precise that private microsinsurance initatives have to be complementary to the public security system because the SP is constant and permanent. Many solutions are presented in that perspective. Because important expenses that come from healthcare (transport, lodging, disability) aren’t considered by the SP, they are perceived as a niche market for microinsurance. The insolvable lack of specialists in marginalized areas proved by the public experience is another one. Microinsurance can provide its users to access more easily the services by means of long distance medical attention and telemedicine.