This is often considered a problem because when they recur to morality, organizations avoid the search for systemic deficiencies in structures or in decision-making processes and therefore renounce efforts which could lead to their own improvement (Ortmann 2009). This contribution examines from a sociological perspective how, in uncertain situations characterised by conflicts and divergent opinions about specific technical questions, moral communication can become a functional manner of dealing with risks. By identifying and sanctioning scapegoats, organizations can display themselves as moral actors and acquire the internal and external backing necessary to continue operating. This is vital in the short term, but can be dangerous over time, because morality sets high expectations but gives little specific advice for action in complex systems.