Scientism, Antropocene and Society: How Science Delusion Is Limiting Justice, Human Progress and Development

The article explores the apparent divide in the philosophies of two prominent patron saints of Classical Philosophy: Socrates, representing Europe, and Orunmila, representing Africa. This dichotomy lends credence to the fact that each region or society possesses its own distinct thought patterns that shape and inform its worldview and relationships. The assertion of superiority between these perspectives, particularly in the context of evolution and development, proves to be highly contentious. However, this is not intended to dismiss the observable differences in developmental levels across various regions at specific points in time. Each society evolves and advances at its own pace, contributing unique value to existence and imbuing meaning into their respective worlds. The contrasting philosophies became particularly evident in the wake of COVID-19, where its origin was shrouded in secrecy amid disputes between the USA and China. The solution, cure or vaccine to tackle the virus became a contentious issue involving some of the wealthiest individuals and nations, as well as organisations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and African nations. The paper argues that the global management and control of COVID-19 represent a pivotal moment in human history where scientific inquiry was heavily influenced by significant anthropocentric dynamics. The paper concludes that during this period, scientism infiltrated scientific discourse, thereby limiting its openness to alternative worldviews that affect humanity.