Biased Behavior Assessments and the Gender Gap in School Grades
Drawing on the theoretical frameworks provided by the halo effect and labeling theory, the study hypothesizes that students’ biased behavior assessments by their teachers correlate with—and potentially contribute to—the gender gap in their GPA. Data from 123 classrooms in rural Hungarian primary schools support this hypothesis. The study finds that classrooms where teachers give girls better behavior grades than boys for the same level of disruptive behavior, tend to exhibit a larger female-favoring gender gap in GPA from the key subjects. Furthermore, the study argues for a potential causal link between teachers’ biased behavior assessments and the GPA gap by leveraging quasi-random student allocation across classrooms in the sample and instrumental variable estimations. The results indicate that a significant portion of the gender gap in GPA is explained by teachers’ biased behavior ratings favoring girls. Thus, this study extends previous research by suggesting that the gender gap in GPA is influenced not only by behavioral differences between girls and boys but also by differential teacher assessments of their behavior.