811.2
Tourism Studies and Conceptual Unsettlement: The Decolonisation Of The Bleached Field
The presentation therefore will principally question:
~1 = Which priority areas of concern in international tourism should be decolonised, if any?
~2 = What would / should / could the decolonisation of Tourism Studies principally entail, or mainly consist of?
~3 = Who should be involved in the so-called decolonised 'cleansing' of Tourism Studies?
~4 = How would the decolonisation of tourism be substantiated educationally (in the schooling of practitioners and researchers who currently drive international tourism)?
The main supposition undergirding this paper is that the decolonisation of the so-called bleached realm of tourism (after Pfaelzer's term "bleached" field / "bleached" understandings) would involve considerable conceptual unsettlement for many of those who work in Tourism Studies / Tourism Management. Much of the required re-oriented understanding would indeed be corrective (as the industry's internal and collaborative sinews of oppression are identified). Hence a more fluid acumen is demanded vis-a-vis the field's "improved conversation with the world" (after Bauman), where the productive / compossible genius latent within it can be positively used much more strategically and frequently for distant / removed / colonialised populations in their own found interests.