640.1
The Beauty Of Advertisement. Searching For Ultimate and Proximate Causes In Cross-Cultural Study
Theoretical underpinnings of the presented study stem from the works of Pierre Bourdieu, but they are not limited to this perspective. The other important perspective is evolutionary theory informed by modern biology. Thus, presentation focuses on both proximate (cultural) and ultimate (evolutionary) explanations of the aesthetic taste.
The main research hypothesis states that individuals with folk cultural capital (inhabitants of rural areas, with low educational level, and low income) exhibit preferences described by sociologists as “low” (i.e. visual expressions drawing on the so-called “Hudson River Biedermeier” style characterized by realistic and emotionally marked landscapes). Such preferences resemble to a large extent the “universal aesthetic predispositions” discussed in the evolutionary theory. These preferences can be also referred to as ‘conservative’ (or ‘collectivist’). However, according to evolutionary theory, these preferences should be found across all social strata. Contrary to this belief, building on Pierre Bourdieu’s class-based understanding of taste diversification, I presume that a natural aesthetic taste is related to folk-type of cultural capital. In other words, my intention is to verify whether the aesthetic universals as described by evolutionists and cognitivists are subject to diversification based on cultural capital.