Exploring a Model of Inter-Disciplinarity Based on Collective Action Theories

The objective is to develop a theoretical model to analyse and facilitate trans-disciplinary dialog and collaboration between art, science, engineering and humanities (SEAD). The model is inspired in key concepts taken from sociological Theories of Collective Action, which usually are applied to analyse different kinds of collective actions. We propose that these theories can be pertinent to understand the interaction between the main dimensions, agents, resources, contexts and strategies of trans-disciplinary action.

The hypothesis is that interdisciplinary action can be considered as a form of collective action according to the following definition: Collective action is “the result of a social action (or collective challenge) carried out by the set of formal and informal interactions established between (1) a plurality of individuals, collectives and organized groups and (2) other social and political actors with which they come into conflict. This conflict is triggered by the appropriation (of), participation (in), and transformation of relations of power to achieve social goals, and above all, through the mobilization of certain sectors of society” (Tejerina, 2010).

When collective action forms groups it is crucial to understand how these collective entities are shaped by means of discussions, negotiation and re-negotiation processes and not take their existence for granted. There is a need to develop a typology of different kinds of interdisciplinary collaboration in which the elements that structure it are reflected. This paper will focus on the key elements to construct a theoretical model for interdisciplinary action and intend to contribute to improve the vision on how interdisciplinary actions change knowledge production and how the aims, motivations, and interactions around interdisciplinary problems synchronize and find resonance (or not) in an environment of limited resources and changing opportunities in which there are collaborators and opponents that need to dialog. Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1142510.