206.6
Transnational Grandparenting By Minority Ethnic Groups Living in England and Wales
METHOD: Frequency and methods of contact (letter writing, telephone calls, ICT, visiting and receiving visitors, sending and receiving gifts, sending and receiving one of gifts of money, sending and receiving regular remittances) were used in exploratory latent profile analysis to identify transnational relationships types for all relative dyads. A four-class model was selected as the best fit to the data. The types of transnational relationships were characterised as Infrequent Digital Communicators; Infrequent Telephone Communicators; Highly Connected Regular Benefactors and Occasional Bilateral-Bounteous-Visitors. Thereafter, our analyses focus on the 88 grandparental transnational relationships. We explore differences between ethnic groups and the gender of the grandparental dyad (e.g. grandmother-granddaughter; grandmother-grandson; grandfather-granddaughter; grandfather-grandson).
RESULTS: Although the numbers are small, trends are observed with regard to differences in grandparental transnational relationship types between ethnic groups. A majority of transnational relationships between Black African grandparents and grandchildren were characterised as Infrequent Telephone Communicators (85%); whereas a majority of relationships between Indian grandparents and grandchildren were characterised as Highly Connected Regular Benefactors. Pakistani and Bangladeshi grandparents were more likely than grandparents in other ethnic groups to be Occasional Bilateral-Bounteous-Visitors. With regard to gender dyads, all transnational relationships were with grandsons and there were no significant differences in relationship types between grandmothers and grandfathers.
IMPLICATIONS: The implications of the findings for intergenerational transmission of cultural values between grandparents and grandchildren are discussed, taking into account the location of the grandchild.