15.4
Temporary Transnational Migrants from East Asia to Japan As Unskilled Foreign Workers and Methodological Transnationalism in the Age of Globalization
Based on the field research, we will discuss a sociological concept named ‘methodological transnationalism,’ in parallel to ‘actual transnationalism’ and ‘ideal transnationalism.’ While recalling ‘methodological cosmopolitanism’ as a critique on ‘methodological nationalism’ by U. Beck, we will examine the meso-level perspective between methodological cosmopolitanism and methodological nationalism. In the present situation of North East Asia where nationalism and political tensions are continuously rising, the meso-level perspective in methodology is required, that is methodological transnationalism. This is also a standpoint that associates with a critical viewpoint against the traditional perspective of sociology.
Another concept we discuss here is the ‘mediators,’ a proximate concept to the G. Simmel’s. However, we took further analysis on the concept and categorized them according to the level: from informal/sympathetic type up to formal/businesslike type. We particularly pay attention to the ‘bridge-type mediators,’ regarding as inevitable actors in transnational interactions.
Based on the discussions above, we will examine an implication on conceptions of the nation-state and (civil) society as the most decisive points in sociology. It is the conception of ‘society beyond a nation-state’ along with the perspective of methodological transnationalism, that is also required to contemporary/future sociology.