JS-55.6
Supply-Side Economics and Demand-Side Planning: U.S. Southwest Water Challenges, the Case of Oklahoma
I examine the development of the Comprehensive Water Plan recently adopted by the state of Oklahoma to demonstrate how planning in the region continues to operate on an undemocratic and “demand-side” basis. With disastrous consequences, the OCWP offers no real plan for long-term change subject to science or the democratic process. Rather, politicians demonstrate their commitment to historical modes of development in the region while downplaying the costs and publicly encouraging skepticism of scientific projections. Drawing on Michał Kalecki’s distinction between “monopoly-capitalist” and democratic planning and exploring the historical turn identified by Forster Ndubisi towards “demand-side” (in ecological terms) planning, I offer a theoretical approach to understanding the limitations of the dominant mode of planning for addressing such long-term anthropogenic ecological crises. I argue that the official designation of drought-stricken counties as facing “disaster,” has short-term implications and is therefore misleading. This region must be recognized as facing an historical transition, in need of genuinely democratic, and ecological or real “supply-side,” economic planning to avoid some of the worst ecological and social outcomes. To end, I offer suggestions based on current, localized attempts at planning outside of the dominant framework, for alternative approaches that, if forced by movements to the state level, or beyond, could help reverse current trends.