770.6
Fighting GM Crops in Argentina and Brazil: Global Constraints, National Opportunities?
There are many other factors differentiating the cases, but also similarities between them. Frames were similar; because movements participate in transnational advocacy networks, where frames circulate. Different from many conflicts in the Global North against GMOs, in these countries there were not only issue-oriented groups, but also identity politics, as peasant movements were important actors. The Via Campesina frame "food sovereignty" is very prominent.
A major difference lies in the organizational bases and forms for resisting GM crops. The great power of the Brazilian movements lies in the building of a sustained campaign among environmental, consumer rights, agro-ecology, human rights and peasants groups. A coalition was formed with dissident scientists, allies in state agencies and politicians. They engaged in legal mobilization and developed a strong communication front as early as 1999, with a weekly newsletter and a blog. None of these factors are found in the Argentinean case.
The belief that by acting together there was a possibility of affecting social change makes a crucial difference: Argentinean activists perceive more global constraints to their fight, whereas Brazilians perceive more national opportunities to theirs.