404.6
Epistemic Practices, Logics of Visualization: Migrants, Asylum-Seekers, and Deviant Subjects
Based on ethnographic research into these sites, we explore these practices in the following ways. First, we will focus on the precise ways differences are made and remade, focusing in particular on the taken-for-granted classifications that are not ‘looked at’ but ‘seen through’, i.e. the figure of the immigrant, that of the asylum-seeker, and that of the deviant subject (Bowker and Star 1999; Mitchell 2012). Second, we will pay attention to the techniques, instruments, and inscriptions that allow for such difference-making. In particular, we focus on the visual materials (graphs, charts, etc.) social scientists produce in their work practices, and on the visualizing technologies (case files) and truth-finding procedures (interrogations, court hearings) both judges and immigration officials deploy in their practices. Seeing and visualization, we argue here, are capacities concentrated in specific centers of expertise and are enabled by and produced in a knowledgeable engagement with the instruments and optical devices of the ‘trade’ (Cf. Goodwin 1994; Haraway 1988). As such, they exhibit logics of visualization.