Epistemological Discrimination and the Marginalization of Indigenous Knowledge and Feminism: A Critical Analysis

This paper explores the intricate link between epistemological discrimination and the exclusion of indigenous knowledge systems (IKS) and feminist perspectives within mainstream Western epistemology. Drawing from the works of scholars like Foucault, Alcoff, Potter, and Harding, the paper argues that Western epistemology has historically positioned itself as the universal standard, leading to the marginalization and devaluation of alternative knowledge systems, particularly those rooted in indigenous and feminist traditions. The discussion focuses on how this epistemological hegemony perpetuates power imbalances, silences diverse voices, and impedes the recognition of women's knowledge, especially in rural contexts where indigenous practices are vital for sustainable livelihoods. By incorporating African feminism and ecofeminism, the paper addresses the challenges faced by rural women in the global South, emphasizing the need for an epistemological shift that acknowledges and validates multiple ways of knowing. The paper also critiques the limitations of Western feminist epistemology, arguing for a more inclusive approach that considers the intersection of race, class, and gender in knowledge production. Through this analysis, the paper calls for the mainstreaming of subjugated knowledges to create a more equitable and comprehensive epistemological framework that supports the liberation of marginalized communities.