The Impact of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident on People's Attitudes Toward Nuclear Energy Policy:Silent Movement

Multiple nationwide opinion surveys, carried out by the government (cabinet office), major media (national newspapers and NHK), the National Institute for Environmental Studies, and the Atomic Energy Society of Japan, have revealed that the Fukushima nuclear accident have heightened people’s perception of disaster risks, fear of nuclear accident, and recognition of pollution, and have changed public opinion on nuclear energy policy.  The gap of opinion on nuclear energy policy between specialists and lay people has widened after the disaster.

    The results of Japanese General Social Survey data show that the objection to the promotion of nuclear energy is strong among females, and weaker among young males and the supporters of the LDP.  This is similar to the data collected after the Chernobyl accident.  Among people who live in a 70km radius of nuclear plants, those who live nearer to plants tend to evaluate nuclear disaster risks higher.  Distance from nuclear plants and the perception of earthquake risk interactively correlate with the opinion on nuclear issues: among people whose evaluation of earthquake risk is low, those who live nearer to the plants are more likely to object to the abolishment of nuclear plants.  It is also found that the nuclear disaster has changed not only people’s attitudes but also people’s behavior.  People have come to try to save electricity in addition to turning off electrical equipments frequently.  It has led to the 5.1% reduction of electrical demands over the previous year in 2011, and 1.0% more in 2012.  The level of commitment to energy saving is found to be correlated with opinion on nuclear issues: 80% of the proponents of nuclear reactor decommissioning have tried to reduce electrical consumption.  The reduction of electrical demands has been people’s silent movement, that is, their manifestation towards the nuclear energy policy.